Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics
A commitment to integrity, transparency, and academic excellence in scholarly publishing.
Juris Criminalis is a scientific journal published online that publishes articles or papers resulting from research in various fields of law, including Criminal Law, Civil Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, and other areas related to legal studies.
This scientific publication ethics statement is a statement of the ethical code of all parties involved in the publication process of this scientific journal, namely managers, editors, reviewer partners, and authors. The Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications essentially upholds three ethical values in publication:
Neutrality
Freedom from conflicts of interest in publication management.
Justice
Granting authorship rights to those entitled to be authors.
Honesty
Free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism.
Publication ethics in Juris Criminalis refer to COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and Peraturan Kepala LIPI Nomor 5 Tahun 2014.
This statement explains the ethical conduct expected from all parties involved in article publication in this journal, which include authors, reviewers, editorial boards, and publishers.
Article publications in scientific journals, such as Juris Criminalis, are essential in legal studies. This journal is published online and features articles or papers resulting from research in various fields of law. Journal publication reflects the quality of authors' work and the supporting institutions, making it imperative to have standard agreements for all parties involved in publication activities.
CV. Ninety Media Publisher, as the publisher, is responsible for all stages of the journal's publication. The publisher acts as the guiding body for the Board of Editors and ensures that the editors maintain the highest standards in journal management. The publisher is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints, or other commercial revenues do not influence the editors' decisions.
Editorial Responsibilities
Publication Decision
The chief editor of Juris Criminalis is responsible for making decisions on whether to accept or reject submitted manuscripts. The activities of the Board of Editors are guided and regulated by policies that comply with legal provisions, including those regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The Board of Editors ensures that the published works are original and free from plagiarism.
The editorial board always strives to ensure that every article published undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain high quality and contribute meaningfully to legal scholarship and education.
Fair Play
The editors evaluate each submitted manuscript based on its intellectual content, regardless of race, gender, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Privacy Policy
The editors and any editorial staff will not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to any party other than the authors, reviewers, or other personnel who are in the Board of Editors and the publisher.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interests
Author(s) should notify the editors if there is a substantive conflict of interest in the publication process. Rejected manuscripts will not be used as the editors' or reviewers' research material without proper agreement with the author(s).
Reviewer's Responsibilities
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Reviewers assist editors in making editorial decisions. Reviewers can assist authors in improving script quality through editorial communication with authors.
Readiness
Any reviewer selected but unwilling or incapable of reviewing within a specified time should notify the editor and resign from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any submitted manuscript for review should be treated as a confidential document. They may not be displayed or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors.
Standard of Objectivity
Reviews should be performed as objective and unbiased as possible. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supportive, logical, and engaging arguments.
Source Acknowledgment
The reviewers must identify relevant publications that have not been cited by the author. The reviewer shall also notify the editor of any substantial or overlapping similarity between the manuscript being reviewed and any other published manuscripts.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interests
Confidential information or ideas obtained through the review process should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not review the manuscript if they have conflict of interest(s).
Author's Responsibilities
Reporting
The author must present an accurate report of the research conducted. The manuscript should contain enough details and references to allow others to copy the work. A fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate report is unethical and unacceptable conduct.
Data Access and Retention
Authors are required to provide raw data in relation to the manuscript if requested. The author(s) shall in any case retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that they have written an original work, and if the author has used the work of others, then the information about that work must be correctly quoted or referred to.
Concurrent Publication and Simultaneous Submission
A writer should not publish essentially the same manuscript in more than one major journals or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is unethical unacceptable conduct.
Contribution to the Manuscript
The inclusion of an author should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the concept, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. Each author shall ensure that all persons whose names are written as authors make an appropriate contribution.
Dangers to Humans or Animals
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have an unusual hazard inherent in their use, the authors should mention in the article that standard safety procedures have been taken.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interests
Author(s) should notify the editors if there is a substantive conflict of interest, including financial conflicts that may be considered to affect the outcome or interpretation of their results. All sources of financial support should be disclosed.
Fundamental Errors in Published Works
When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his/her published articles, the author is obliged to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the article.
