An Analysis Of Students Difficulties In Writing Recount Text On The Eleventh Grade At SMA Negeri 21 Medan

Authors

Riasty Latanya Sianturi , Sahlan Tampubolon , Fenty Debora Napitupulu

DOI:

10.29303/kopula.v6i2.5411

Published:

2024-10-24

Issue:

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Oktober

Keywords:

Difficulties, Recount Text, An Analysis

Articles

Downloads

How to Cite

Sianturi, R. L., Tampubolon, S., & Napitupulu, F. D. (2024). An Analysis Of Students Difficulties In Writing Recount Text On The Eleventh Grade At SMA Negeri 21 Medan. Kopula: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pendidikan, 6(2), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.29303/kopula.v6i2.5411

Abstract

This thesis is about an analysis of students difficulties on writing recount text in the eleventh grade at SMA Negeri 21 Medan. The objectives of research are  to analyze the student's difficulties on writing recount text in the eleventh grade at SMA Negeri 21 Medan And to identify the factors causing students difficulties in writing recount text. This research was conducting by applying Descriptive Qualitative research. The Researcher took 15 students of eleventh in getting the data. The instrument of the collecting data was the writing test and interview. The technique of collecting data was the researcher explained what the recount text, generic structure, language features and giving the example of recount text. The researcher asked the eleventh grade students wrote a recount text that chooses by themselves in 60 minutes and the researcher collected the paper, after that the researcher do the interview directly to all student.  the result of the analysis of students difficulties showed that majority of the students at eleventh grade at SMA Negeri 21 Medan still low in writing recount text. it could be seen from the analysis the test from content of the results of the percentage is 15%, organization of the result on the percentage is 19%, language use of the percentage in the result is 26%, vocabulary of the percentage in the result is 24% and mechanic of the percentage in the result is 16%. Based on the result of analysis of student difficulties showed that majority of the students factors are difficulties of content such as the lack of experience to developing ideas. Difficulties of organization, students lack of structure to organize ideas and story elements in a clear and logical manner. Difficulties of vocabulary, the lack of word in English and limitation of vocabulary to translate the meanings of certain words. Difficulties of language use, lack of grammar such as use of sentence structure, the use of nouns, verbs, and aspects of grammar. And the last Difficulties of Mechanic, lack of knowledge about punctuation marks such as commas periods and each other formats. The analysis shows that students still make mistakes in all five aspects of the 15 students who were used as participants, none of them succeeded in writing recount correctly. so it can be concluded that students are still difficult in writing recount text.  

References

Adosi, C. (2020). Qualitative data collection instruments : the most challenging and easiest to use. Institute for Educational Planning and Administration, September, 0–7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344251614

Ahlan, A. (2021). Written Feedback Approach: An Alternative Way In Improving Learners’writing Skill. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL), 4(1), 45-50.

Amin, N. F., Garancang, S., & Abunawas, K. (2023). Populasi dalam penelitian merupakan suatu hal yang sangt penting, karena ia merupakan sumber informasi. Jurnal Pilar, 14(1), 15–31.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2009). Introduction to Research in Education. 07(10), 696. https://books.google.com/books?id=FqF7n0zGJm0C&pgis=1

Azar, B., & Hagen, S. A. (2006). Betty Azar - Basic English Grammar 3rd Ed.pdf.

Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1960

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning And Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 14. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586319

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Book Reviews Research Methods in Education. The Austr Alian Educational Researcher, 2, 147–156.

Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2016). Genre-Based Approach: What and How to Teach and to Learn Writing. English Language Teaching, 9(9), 45. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n9p45

Dr. Ibrahim Mohamed Alfaki. (2015). University Students’ English Writing Problems: Diagnosis andRemedy. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(May), 40–52.

Fisya, J. A., & Fudhla, N. (2022). An Analysis of Students’ Ability in Writing Recount Text at the Tenth Grade Students. Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(4), 476–481. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v11i4.120232

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of Language Teaching Third Edition. 57(October), 386. https://www.academia.edu/25472823/The_Practice_of_English_Language_Teaching_4th_Edition_Jeremy_Harmer

Harmer J. (2007). Harmer_J_2007_The_Practice_of_English_La. In The Practice Of English (pp. 1–448).

Heaton. (1988). J_B_Heaton_Writing_English_Language_Tes.pdf (p. 192).

Hordósy, R. (2011). Educational research and inquiry: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Evaluation & Research in Education, 24(3), 222–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2011.582692

Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications., January 1995, 158–176. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1995-97753-009&loginpage=Login.asp&site=ehost-live

Husna, A., & Multazim, A. (2019). Students’ Difficulties in Writing Recount Text At Inclusion Classes. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.18592/let.v9i1.3077

Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40

Jihad, A. (2023). The Implementation Of Pie (Point, Illustration, Explanation) And Author’s Chair Strategy In Teaching Writing At The Tenth Grade Students Of Sman 18 Makassar. Jurnal Suluh Pendidikan, 11(1), 75-80.

Kadek, N., Sayukti, H., Kurniawan, E., & Indonesia, U. P. (2018). An Analysis of Student's Recount Text in Systematic. 4(1), 53–59.

Lina, M. F. (2022). Writing Job Application Letter And Resume With Google Document: An Experimental Research. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL), 5(2), 125-136.

Lund, J., & Winke, P. M. (2008). Book review: Brown, H. Douglas (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education. 324 pp. $48.00 paper. ISBN 0—13—098834—0; Brown, James Dean (2005). Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide to. Language Testing, 25(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207086784

Napitupulu, F. D. (2018). The Effect of Hamburger Strategy in Writing Descriptive Text of the 1st Semester Students of English Department in Nommensen University. Journal of English Language and Culture, 7(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v7i1.1018

Manullang, N. A., Tampubolon, S., Sitorus, N., & Simarmata, R. O. (2023). An Analysis Of Coherence And Cohesive Device In Writing Recount Text Used By The Fifth Semester Students Of English Department In HKBP Nommensen University. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 3765-3773.

Rajagukguk, R. (2023). An Analysis of Teacher’s Strategies in Teaching Writing on Recount Text in Pandemic Through Online Class at the tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Kolang. Jurnal Suluh Pendidikan, 11(1), 108-114.

Randaccio, M. (2013). Writing skills: theory and practice. QuaderniCIRD, 7(1), 51–74.

Reskiawan, B., Riyani, N., & Satriyani, S. (2019). An Analysis of EFL Students’ Difficulties in Writing At The Second Grade of SMAN 1 Wundulako. Tamaddun, 18(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v18i2.70

Rianti, W., Hardi, V. A., Afriyeni, Y., & Rasyidah, U. (2022). Analysis of Teaching Writing Strategies. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3705–3712. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1866

Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis Data Kualitatif Ahmad Rijali UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. 17(33), 81–95.

Sayukti, N. K. H., & Kurniawan, E. (2018). an Analysis of Student’S Recount Text in Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspectives. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 4(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.4.1.466.53-59

Septiana, T. I. Utilizing Teams Games Tournament in Teaching Reading to Enhance Students’ Comprehension on Narrative Texts. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL), 6(2), 139-148.

Shriganeshan, K., Razi, S., Rao, P. S., Nadera, B., Istikomah, & Ajeep. (2017). Effective Teaching of Writing Skills to the English Langage International Journal of English Language Literature and Translation Studies(IJELR) Lecturer in English , English Language Centre , King Faisal University , Al-Hasa , Kingdom of Saudi Arabi. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 5(January), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.33329/ijelr.64.196

Situmorang, Y. J., Tampubolon, S., Berutu, L. E., & Sirait, A. (2022). An analysis of students’ difficulties in writing report text. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 4246-4253.

Telaumbanua, T. (2020). Students’ Difficulties in Writing Narrative Text at The Ninth Grade Students of SMP Swasta Kristen BNKP Telukdalam. Journal Education and Development, 8(1), 464–469.

Wilson, R. M. (1955). English language. In Year’s Work in English Studies (Vol. 36, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ywes/XXXVI.1.44

Zalukhu, B. (2023). an Analysis of Collaborative Learning in Reading Comprehension at the Tenth Grade of Sma Negeri 2 Gunungsitoli in 2022/2023. Jurnal Suluh Pendidikan, 11(2), 158-168.

Author Biographies

Riasty Latanya Sianturi, Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

Sahlan Tampubolon, Nommensen HKBP University

Fenty Debora Napitupulu, Nommensen HKBP University

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Riasty Latanya Sianturi riasty, Sahlan Tampubolon, Fenty Debora Napitupulu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Kopula: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bahasa, agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Kopula: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bahasa.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.