The Effect of Pronunciation Variations on Students’ Speech Perception: A Psycholinguistic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29303/kopula.v8i1.9404Kata Kunci:
EFL students;, pronunciation variations;, speech perception;, listening perception;, psycholinguistics.Abstrak
Learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) are often exposed to pronunciation variances that could affect their perception and comprehension of spoken English. Variations in pronunciation, particularly in words that sound similar, frequently cause perceptual ambiguity and misunderstandings when listening. The purpose of this study is to investigate how learners perceive and adjust to various pronunciation forms, as well as how pronunciation differences affect students' perceptions of speech. This study employed a descriptive-interpretive approach within a psycholinguistic framework. The participants were English Education Study Program undergraduates who had previously studied the language. A hearing exercise with words with different pronunciations and a perceptual questionnaire intended to elicit students' experiences, opinions, and cognitive methods in processing spoken input were used to gather data. The results show that initial confusion and hesitancy in word recognition were driven by pronunciation variances, especially when there was little contextual assistance. But with repeated exposure, students showed that they could modify their perspective by referencing past hearing experiences. These findings imply that speech perception is a cognitive process that is both dynamic and experience-based. The study comes to the conclusion that including pronunciation differences into listening teaching will improve students' comprehension of spoken English in everyday communication and increase their perceptual flexibility.
Referensi
Al-Shami, F. (2024). Exploring High-Variability Phonetic Training through Text-To-Speech Technology in ESL Pronunciation Pedagogy.
Bassetti, B., Escudero, P., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input. In Applied Psycholinguistics (Vol. 36, Issue 1, pp. 1–6). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000393
Bosker, H. R. (2022). Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress. Language and Speech, 65(2), 472–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211030307
Chen, J., & Chang, H. (2022a). Sketching the Landscape of Speech Perception Research (2000–2020): A Bibliometric Study. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 13). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822241
Chen, J., & Chang, H. (2022b). Sketching the Landscape of Speech Perception Research (2000–2020): A Bibliometric Study. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 13). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822241
Cheng, H. S., Niziolek, C. A., Buchwald, A., & McAllister, T. (2021). Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.660948
Cutler, A. (2023). Representation of second language phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000459
Darcy, I., Llompart, M., Hayes-Harb, R., Mora, J. C., Adrian, M., Cook, S., & Ernestus, M. (2025). Phonological processing and the L2 mental lexicon Looking back and moving forward. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 47(1), 361–387. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263124000482
Desmeules-Trudel, F., & Zamuner, T. S. (2023). Spoken word recognition in a second language: The importance of phonetic details. Second Language Research, 39(2), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211030604
Hearnshaw, S., Baker, E., Pomper, R., McGregor, K. K., Edwards, J., & Munro, N. (2023). The Relationship Between Speech Perception, Speech Production, and Vocabulary Abilities in Children: Insights From By-Group and Continuous Analyses. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 66(4), 1173–1191. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00441
Hossein Keshavarz, M., & Keshavarz, A. (2022). The Effect of L2 Input on Young Learners’ Pronunciation Performance in English 1, 2. In MEXTESOL Journal (Vol. 46, Issue 3).
Ishtiaq, M. (2022). Book Review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40
Kim, H., McMurray, B., Sorensen, E., & Oleson, J. (2025). The consistency of categorization-consistency in speech perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 32(5), 2246–2258. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02700-x
Kutlu, E., Baxelbaum, K., Sorensen, E., Oleson, J., & McMurray, B. (2024). Linguistic diversity shapes flexible speech perception in school age children. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80430-1
Leung, K. K. W., Lu, Y. A., & Wang, Y. (2025). Examining Speech Perception–Production Relationships Through Tone Perception and Production Learning Among Indonesian Learners of Mandarin †. Brain Sciences, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15070671
Lim, J. N. Q., Gordon, G., Forrest, C. L. D., Yiend, J., & Martin, A. F. (2025). Individual Differences in Speech Perception Under Adverse Conditions: The Role of Early Perceptual Learning. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2025.2571366
Maret’atush S, K., Fika, W., Afifah, N., Indriani, ; Novi, Ini’matul R, A., Noor, ;, & Oktovianti, F. (2021). The Effectiveness of Google Form as A Medium for Assessing Students’ English Learning Outcome in High School Level. https://doi.org/10.24090/celti.2021.399
Pattamadilok, C., Wang, S., Bolger, D., & Dubarry, A. S. (2025). Learning to read transforms phonological into phonographic representations. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88650-9
Sailuddin, S. P., Rafli, Z., Kamal, M., & Hakim, A. (2025). Audio versus Multimodal Input: A Case Study of Speech Perception among Learners in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Context. Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8, 2025. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v8i4.49140
Saito, K., Hanzawa, K., Petrova, K., Kachlicka, M., Suzukida, Y., & Tierney, A. (2022). Incidental and Multimodal High Variability Phonetic Training: Potential, Limits, and Future Directions. Language Learning, 72(4), 1049–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12503
Verbeke, G., Mitterer, H., & Simon, E. (2025). Phonetic reduction in native and non-native English speech: Assessing the intelligibility for L2 listeners. Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728925000021
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Irene Zai, Arif W.T. Halawa, Muharni S. Zebua, Afore Tahir Harefa
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Kopula: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bahasa, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Kopula: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Bahasa.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
