Presupposition in the Lyrics of ‘Erika’: A Pragmatic Study of Assumptions in a Controversial Context

Authors

  • Mesya Natalia Siboro Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Giana Natasha Darosi Br. Sitepu Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Suryani Praysiska Silalahi Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Salwa Naysila Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Rohmayani Kesogihen Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Dian Marisha Putri Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/kopula.v8i2.10462

Keywords:

Kontroversi; Lirik Lagu; Makna Implisit; Pragmatik; Presuposisi; Stereotip Gender

Abstract

The presupposition in the lyrics of Erika song was analyzed by applying fairy tale theory of presupposition from George Yule, a pragmatic. This research attempts to analyze the species of presupposition in the song and also describe how implicit assumptions impact audience interpretation and public controversy. Qualitative descriptive is used in this study because the implicit meaning of lyrics tells by song. Data Source Lyrics of “Erika” or “Goyang Erika, Cinta 25 Karat” Orkes semi dangdut (OSD) Himpunan Mahasiswa Tambang (HMT) Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB). Data were collected by documentation and library research methods. The analysis exposes two forms of presupposition, namely, existential and lexical presupposition. The first presupposition is existential presupposition which dominates as in the lyrics “Walau sudah janda” that implies having been married before, whereas Lexical Presuppositions can be found in this lyric. Their findings suggest that implicit stereotypes about women, sexuality, and gender shown in the lyrics also shape people views of the song beyond its literal meaning.

 

Author Biographies

  • Giana Natasha Darosi Br. Sitepu, Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Undergraduate Student at English Literature Study Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

     

  • Suryani Praysiska Silalahi, Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Undergraduate Student at English Literature Study Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

     

  • Salwa Naysila, Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Undergraduate Student at English Literature Study Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

     

  • Rohmayani Kesogihen, Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Undergraduate Student at English Literature Study Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

     

  • Dian Marisha Putri, Department of English Literature, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Lecturer at the English Literature Study Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

References

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2021). What is Qualitative in Research. Qualitative Sociology, 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09497-w

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-20-00059-z

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices.

Hidayat, A., Mujani, S., & Wahab, B. R. (2025). The Implicature and Presupposition Analysis of “ Fever ” Song Lyrics by. 10(1). https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v10i1.279

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture. www.nyupress.org

Lazar, M. M. (2011). Feminist critical discourse analysis. 372–387.

Leech, N., Leech, T., & Linguistics, G. (1984). N. LEECH - Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman, 1983. 250pp. ’0 Le go. 123–129.

Levinson, S. C., & Syntax, P. H. M. (1983). PRAGMATICS. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Mukminin, M. S. (2024). ILLOCUTIONARY SPEECH ACTS IN SONG LYRICS : A PRAGMATICS STUDY ON “ KUPU-KUPU ” BY TIARA ANDINI. 5.

Ramadhan, K. B., & Riansyah, J. E. (2025). PRAGMATIC INTERPRETATIONS OF IDIOMATIC PHRASES IN MITSKI ’ S LYRICISM. 5(3), 381–389.

Simanjuntak, F., Syahfina, W., Hasibuan, Y., & Manurung, L. W. (2025). An Analysis of Presuppositions in the Selected Song Lyrics of Hendry Moodie’s Album. 4(2), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v4i2.363

Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning Qualitative Research : Design and Decision Making for New Researchers. 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Presupposition in the Lyrics of ‘Erika’: A Pragmatic Study of Assumptions in a Controversial Context. (2026). Kopula: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pendidikan, 8(2), 452-459. https://doi.org/10.29303/kopula.v8i2.10462

Most read articles by the same author(s)