The Effect of Silkworm (Tubifex sp.) Growth on Rice Field Mud, Chicken Manure, and Tofu Pulp Media with Different Compositions

Authors

  • Mulyadi Safrika Aquaculture, Faculty of Science, Nahdlatul Ulama University of West Sumatra
  • Reffi Aryzegovina Aquaculture, Faculty of Science, Nahdlatul Ulama University of West Sumatra
  • Boni Ikhlas Aquaculture, Faculty of Science, Nahdlatul Ulama University of West Sumatra
  • Lisa Mayasari Aquaculture, Faculty of Science, Nahdlatul Ulama University of West Sumatra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/jfh.v5i4.8149

Keywords:

Silkworms, Rice Field Mud, Chicken Manure, Tofu Pulp, Growth

Abstract

The rapidly increasing demand for silkworms as natural feed has caused prices to rise, making silkworms a potentially valuable natural feed for farmed fish. To date, the supply of silkworms as natural feed still relies on nature, meaning that silkworms are not available throughout the year, but only during the rainy season. One way to support the availability of silkworms is through cultivation. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of chicken manure, rice field mud, and tofu pulp on the growth of silkworms. The method used was a quantitative experiment with a completely randomized design (CRD) consisting of four treatments: P1 (100% mud), P2 (50% mud + 50% chicken manure), P3 (50% mud + 50% tofu pulp), and P4 (50% mud + 25% chicken manure + 25% tofu pulp). The results of the study showed that treatment P4 provided the highest absolute biomass growth with an average of 3.03 g. This indicates that the combination of chicken manure and tofu pulp provides an optimal synergistic effect for worm growth. From these results, it can be concluded that the combination of rice field mud, chicken manure, and tofu pulp (P4) is the most effective medium for silkworm growth.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

The Effect of Silkworm (Tubifex sp.) Growth on Rice Field Mud, Chicken Manure, and Tofu Pulp Media with Different Compositions. (2025). Journal of Fish Health, 5(4), 466-475. https://doi.org/10.29303/jfh.v5i4.8149