Peer Review Process
Private Law will publish the only paper strictly following Private Law guidelines and manuscript preparation. Those papers are read by editorial members (upon a field of specialization) and will be screened by Managing Editor to meet the necessary criteria of Private Law publication. Manuscripts will be sent to two peer-reviewers (double-blind peer-review) based on their historical experience in reviewing manuscripts or based on their field of specialization. Private Law has reviewing forms in order to keep the same items reviewed by two reviewers. Then the editorial board will make a decision upon the reviewer's comments or advice. Reviewers will give their assessment on originality, clarity of presentation, contribution to the field/science, Private Law has three kinds of decisions:
- Accepted, as it is
- Accepted by Minor Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
- Accepted by Major Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
- Rejected (generally, on grounds of outside of scope and aim, major technical description problems, lack of clarity of presentation)
For checking similarity or plagiarism, Private Law Editorial Board will screen plagiarism with using Turnitin Program. For Private Law similarity or plagiarism policy information please click here, the editorial board will reject the manuscript immediately.
Authors must sign the Declaration of Originality the undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.
